‹ Back

How Unchained Capitalism drives Mass Immigration

 

One of the most pressing issues brought out across the whole political spectrum is uncontrollable immigration and the demographic damage that comes with it. And yet, despite this, nobody on the traditional left and right are capable of offering a solution. Primarily because the clique that functions as a beneficiary of those parties doesn’t want to, but also because Marxist socialism and liberal capitalism are incapable of offering an ideological solution anyway.

 

Marxist socialism with its dogma that teaches the supremacy of class over nation and race and its age-old rallying cry, ‘Workers of the world unite’, was always an internationalist force, seeking the erasure of ethnic and racial distinctions in favour of a class (and therefore wealth) orientated doctrine.

 

Liberal capitalism, on the other hand, teaches the supremacy of money and individual greed, and thus has become, especially since the 1980s, the primary driver of mass immigration and demographic replacement as a tool for maximising financial gain.

 

To understand the link between capitalism and mass immigration, we have to look back to the start of the industrial age in the late 1700s to early 1800s:

 

At this time, the growth of industries created and demanded mass employment of people for productive purposes beyond basic subsistence. The idea of working for a wage as opposed to working just to survive came into being for huge numbers of people. Instead of toiling on farms to provide food for themselves, the growth of agricultural technologies made this unnecessary and thus huge numbers of labourers were able to move to the growing industrial cities or mining towns as an alternative.

 

This was the beginning of migrant labour. Poor farmers or labourers from the countryside could be brought into these industrial centres to create labour surpluses, thus keeping labour costs down via competition and undercutting the existing workforce. There was no racial or ethnic tension because the people involved were all racially kin. As the 19th century went on, the growth of transportation technologies made it possible for labourers in search of work to travel greater distances. Whereas in 1800 a factory seeking cheap labour might have to source it from the immediate countryside, by 1850 the growth of roads, railways, and slums made it possible for people to migrate all over Britain for the same purpose.

 

By the second half of the 19th century, the technologies for movement of people had grown to such a scale and efficiency that instead of seeking cheap labour from other counties or distant ends of Great Britain, it became possible to source that labour from other countries. The most notable is the influx of Irish workers seeking better conditions than in Eire, and often being used to undercut English or Scottish labour. There was also a time period before the First World War where workers from Northern Europe, including Germany, were used to do exactly the same thing – with the knowledge that the British pound exchanged at such a high value that wages taken home after a year or two provided a huge income.

 

The racial and ethnic conflict began to come into existence at this point, probably the most well-known example being conflict between Irish and English ethnic groups. But still, it was limited by the fact that the racial differences were minor.

 

Fast forward another fifty years to the middle of the 20th century.

 

Technology for movement of people via ocean liners had made mass transit between continents possible, and the opening up of China, the Middle East, and Africa to international trade had created an entirely new market of cheap labourers who could be shipped in to keep wages low and profits high. The exact same principles which drove poor farm labourers to be shipped to early industrial cities also drove ocean liners full of Africans, Indians and East Asians to turn up in British docks for work.

 

By the time you get to the late 20th century, with the advent of air travel and rapid communication, it has become possible for cheap labour to be outsourced to virtually anywhere in line with the exact same principle of liberal capitalism. The creation of terminally destabilised places in the Middle East and Africa has created a source of cheap labour that is so desperate for any kind of income that it becomes possible to undercut virtually anyone else.

 

The demographic devastation being inflicted upon Britain is not something which is happening in a vacuum, but is a direct and deliberate consequence of free-market liberal capitalism.

 

Whereas once it was limited to being national in scale, now it is international in scale, and it serves only one master, which is international finance.

 

What this ultimately means is that stopping and reversing the demographic damage that has been done to Britian, and insulting ourselves against it ever returning, involves eliminating the system that has caused it to happen as opposed to all the people in that system. It is impossible to reconcile the idea of an ethnically and racially conscious and unified state with free-market liberal capitalism. This does not mean the end of private enterprise, but it means the end of uncontrolled capitalism and the end of the supremacy of money over all else.

 

Instead, money must always remain subordinate to the state on some level.

 

These indisputable facts about the origins of mass migration should highlight the insanity of every interpretation of racial ‘Nationalism’ that involves liberalism, free-market capitalism, libertarianism, and globalism. Those ideas are fundamentally impossible to combine.

 

The National Agenda of the National Rebirth Party is the only political programme that exists in Great Britain which has an economic worldview which is capable of achieving its political and social aims – by explicitly rejecting International Finance and recognising the link between free-market capitalism and demographic replacement and erosion of collective national power and identity.

 

nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Join-as-a-Member

 

By Alek Yerbury, Party Leader